Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 37777 articles
Browse latest View live

Sophie Turner's Wine-Fueled Instagram Story About Arya's Sex Scene Is A Mood

$
0
0

Warning: This article contains spoilers for the eighth series of Game Of Thrones.

We need to talk about Sophie Turner talking about her Game Of Thrones co-star Maisie Williams’ sex scene on Instagram on Sunday night.

“In honor of Easter, I guess ’Game of Thrones’ wanted the storyline to have a little Easter bunny hop hop hoppin’ into that pussy. And that’s the tea,” Sophie said, while wearing a robe and swigging wine in an Instagram story.

Maisie Williams and Sophie Turner

In case you forgot, in the second episode of the dragon-filled final season of GOT, Maisie’s character’ Arya Stark got down and dirty with Joe Dempsie’s Gendry Baratheon ― the late King Robert Baratheon’s only living bastard ― after literal YEARS of tension.

The duo got it on after Gendry delivered a custom-made weapon Arya demanded he make for her. Arya grilled him about his experience with other women and promptly told him to take his pants off.

’Twas female empowerment personified.

In response to this, Turner, who plays sister Sansa to Arya, went on Instagram to call out her friend getting freaky. 

Honestly, this is the only thing we should all be talking about today. Sex is good as is celebrating it when your friends are enjoying some ... fictional or otherwise.


BJP Fields Hans Raj Hans From North-West Delhi, Drops Udit Raj

$
0
0

NEW DELHI — The BJP on Tuesday announced singer Hans Raj Hans’ candidature from North-West Delhi, hours before the deadline for filing of nomination.

Udit Raj, the incumbent MP from North-West, had threatened to resign and contest as an independent if his candidature was not announced from the seat. 

For the latest elections news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

This was one of the reasons behind the delay in announcing Hans’ candidature, party insiders said.

Hans will take on Guggan Singh of the AAP and Rajesh Lilothia of the Congress.

Opposition Leaders Questioning Balakot Strike Should've Been Strapped To Rockets: Devendra Fadnavis

$
0
0

MUMBAI — Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said opposition leaders seeking proof of the Balakot air strike should have been strapped to rockets so that they could have “seen with their own eyes”.

State BJP minister Pankaja Munde had also made a similar remark recently about sending Congress president Rahul Gandhi to another country with a bomb strapped to him.

“We should have strapped some of the sceptical opposition leaders to the rocket, so that they could have seen with their own eyes,” Fadnavis said at a poll rally at Virar in adjoining Palghar district Monday.

The opposition keeps doubting this government’s performance and even raises question mark over the armed forces and their courage, he said.

“What can we say about the opposition ‘mahakhichadi’ (grand mixture). They did not acknowledge the courage of our air force and raised doubts on Balakot air strike.

“Had there been an inkling about doubts from the opposition, we could have strapped their leaders to the rockets which were sent to Balakot to see the attack with their own eyes,” Fadnavis said.

Munde, minister for women and child development, at a poll rally in Jalna district last week made similar comments against Gandhi.

“Whoever is raising such doubts on effectiveness of the air strike, I would like to say, Rahul Gandhi should be tied to a bomb and dropped to another country. I think only then they (opposition) will understand what we have done.” PTI ND VT MRJ

For the latest elections news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

Sri Lanka Blasts A Retaliation To Christchurch Mosque Attacks, Parliament Told

$
0
0
A coffin is carried to a burial site during a mass funeral at St Sebastian Church on April 23, 2019 in Negombo, Sri Lanka.

The Sri Lankan terror attacks were a retaliation for the mosque attacks in New Zealand’ Christchurch, the country’s defence minister informed its Parliament on Tuesday.

The Sri Lankan government apologised for its failure to act despite receiving advance intelligence inputs about the possibility of terror attacks that rocked the island nation on Easter Sunday, killing 310 people.

A series of eight coordinated blasts ripped through three churches and three high-end hotels frequented by tourists and left 500 people injured in the country’s deadliest violence since the devastating civil war ended in 2009.

Government spokesperson Rajitha Senaratne said that the warnings about the blasts were received in the days before the attacks, the CNN reported.

“We saw the warnings and we saw the details given,” he said. 

“We are very, very sorry, as a government we have to say ― we have to apologise to the families and the institutions about this incident,” Senaratne, also the health minister, said. 

All the families would be compensated and churches rebuilt, he said.

 

The spokesperson said that one of the warnings referred to National Tawheed Jamath, or NTJ, a little-known local Islamist group that defaced Buddhist statues in the past. 

However, he did not believe that a local group could have acted alone.  “There must be a wider international network behind it,” he said.

Seven suicide bombers believed to be NTJ members carried out the series of blasts.

However, no group has claimed responsibility for the attacks, but police have arrested 40 people - mostly members of the NIJ - in connection with the blasts.

In the wake of bombings, the military has been given a wider berth to detain and arrest suspects powers that were used during the civil war but withdrawn when it ended.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said he feared the massacre could unleash instability and pledged to “vest all necessary powers with the defense forces” to act against those responsible.

SC Tells Gujarat Govt To Give Rs 50 Lakh To Bilkis Bano, 2002 Riot Victim

$
0
0

NEW DELHI — The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Gujarat government to give Rs 50 lakh compensation, a job and accommodation to Bilkis Bano who was gang raped during the 2002 riots in the state.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Rajan Gogoi was informed by the Gujarat government that action has been taken against the erring police officials in the case.

A bench, also comprising Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, was informed by the state’s counsel that pension benefits of the erring officials have been stopped and the IPS officer who was convicted by the Bombay High Court in the case has been demoted by two ranks.

For the latest elections news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

Bano had earlier refused to accept the offer of Rs 5 lakh and had sought exemplary compensation from the state government in a plea before the top court.

The top court had earlier asked the Gujarat government to take disciplinary action in two weeks against the erring police officials, including an IPS officer, convicted by the Bombay High Court in the case.

A special court had on 21 January, 2008 convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment 11 men for raping Bano and murdering seven of her family members in the aftermath of the Godhra riots, while acquitting seven persons including the policemen and doctors.

TikTok Owner Says India Ban Leading To Massive Losses, Putting Jobs At Risk

$
0
0

NEW DELHI — India’s ban on popular Chinese video app TikTok is resulting in “financial losses” of up to $500,000 a day for its developer, Beijing Bytedance Technology Co, and has put more than 250 jobs at risk, the company said in a court filing seen by Reuters.

TikTok allows users to create and share short videos with special effects and is one of the world’s most popular apps. It has been downloaded by nearly 300 million users so far in India, out of more than 1 billion downloads globally, according to analytics firm Sensor Tower.

Earlier this month, Madras High Court ordered the Centre to prohibit its downloads, saying the app was encouraging pornography. Acting upon instructions from the central IT ministry, Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc’s Google last week removed TikTok from their India app stores.

The developments have dealt a blow to the India growth plans of Bytedance, which is backed by Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp and by private equity. Bytedance, one of the world’s most valuable startups potentially worth around $75 billion, was considering a public listing in Hong Kong this year, sources told Reuters in August.

The ban has also worried the social media industry in India as it sees legal worries mounting if courts increasingly regulate content on their platforms.

In the filing made to Supreme Court on Saturday, Bytedance urged the court to quash the ban and direct the federal IT ministry to tell companies such as Google and Apple to make the app available again on their platforms.

The court filing is not publicly available and its contents have not been previously reported.

Bytedance pegged financial losses at $500,000 each day, which it said includes destruction in the value of its investments and loss of commercial revenue. It added the ban would result in its reputation and goodwill taking a hit with both advertisers and investors.

“Banning has had adverse impact on the user base of this app, losing close to 1 million new users per day... It is estimated that approximately six million requests for downloads could not be effected since the ban came into effect,” the company said in the filing.

A spokesman for TikTok and the central IT ministry did not respond to requests for comment.

COURT BATTLE, CONTENT WOES

Supreme Court has so far not provided any interim relief on repeated pleas by Bytedance and referred the case back to the Madras High Court, where the case will next be heard on Wednesday. 

Memes and music videos thrive on TikTok, although some clips show youngsters, some scantily clad, lip-syncing and dancing to popular tunes.

Its growing popularity has drawn criticism from some politicians and parents who say its content is inappropriate. Madras High Court, which ruled against TikTok after an individual filed a public interest litigation, has said the app could also expose children to sexual predators.

The Supreme Court filing included a table in which Bytedance compared TikTok to Facebook, Instagram and Twitter by listing 13 of its implemented safety features, including parental controls.

A “very minuscule” proportion of TikTok’s videos were considered inappropriate or obscene, the company has said.

“The constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights of free speech and expression ... of numerous Indian citizens have been severely impacted,” the company said in its latest filing.

Islamic State Claims Responsibility for Sri Lanka Blasts

$
0
0

CAIRO — Islamic State has claimed responsibility for coordinated bombings in Sri Lanka which killed 321 people and injured about 500 others, the group’s AMAQ news agency said on Tuesday.

A post shared on Twitter on Tuesday read: “Security Source to Amaq agency: Those who carried out the attack that targeted the citizens of the coalition and Christians in Sri Lanka the day before yesterday were from the fighters of the Islamic State.”

The group did not give evidence for its claim.

The bombings were a retaliation for the recent deadly attacks on mosques in New Zealand, a Sri Lankan official said.

The toll rose to 321 dead on Tuesday with about 500 people wounded.

“The initial investigation has revealed that this was in retaliation for the New Zealand mosque attack,” junior minister for defence Ruwan Wijewardene told parliament.

He did not elaborate on why authorities believed there was a link to the killing of 50 people at two mosques in the New Zealand city of Christchurch during Friday prayers on March 15. A lone gunman carried out those attacks.

Wijewardene said two Sri Lankan Islamist groups - the National Thawheed Jama’ut and Jammiyathul Millathu Ibrahim - were responsible for the blasts early on Sunday during Easter services and as high-end hotels served breakfast.

Here’s What Women Say About Their Partners In Therapy

$
0
0

Therapists often hear an honest account of what their patients are really thinking and feeling when it comes to their romantic relationships, as opposed to the more polished versions people share with friends and family. 

We first asked therapists to reveal the most common complaints men have about their partners. Then we asked another group of therapists to do the same, this time focusing on their female clients. Below, find out what women are saying about their partners in therapy and how these mental health professionals help them work through the issues. 

I feel like my partner isn’t pulling their weight around the house or with the kids.

Among the women marriage and family therapist Jennifer Chappell Marsh works with, a common complaint is that their male partners aren’t stepping up enough when it comes to completing household chores or taking care of the kids. And even when their partners do pitch in (as they should!), the emotional or mental load still tends to fall on women’s shoulders. 

“The mental workload is a real-life phenomenon that refers to the invisible work of being the ‘knower’ and ‘manager’ of the household,” Marsh explained. “Women are expected to notice and delegate when the groceries are low, organize the social calendar, plan for child care, schedule doctor appointments, meet school obligations and buy family or friends gifts. Sure, women can ask for their partner’s help, but it still means that they are in the managerial role and they risk being labeled as a ‘nag.’”

Therapist Deborah Duley of Empowered Connections, a counseling practice that specializes in women, girls and the LGBTQ+ community, said that she hears this same complaint from her female clients in queer relationships. To deal with the issue, she advises them to calmly communicate that they’re feeling overwhelmed and list specific tasks they would like their partner to take over. In many cases, the other partner is unaware of just how much their wife is taking on or is unsure how best to help. 

“Having a specific chore they can do like start dinner, give the kids a bath or vacuum the living room seems to help the partner feel more helpful and my client begin to feel more supported, which is a win-win,” Duley said. 

My partner tells me I’m being “crazy” or “irrational.”

Words like “crazy” or “irrational” have a long history of being used to dismiss or undermine women’s often legitimate feelings or experiences. When someone, particularly a partner, slaps you with this label, it can be both hurtful and frustrating. 

“This is called ‘emotion dismissing,’” said couples therapist Laura Heck, co-host of the podcast Marriage Therapy Radio. “It is a crummy attempt to tamper big emotions, usually because your partner is uncomfortable with these emotions in other people. When we experience emotions like anger, sadness or frustration, we turn to our partner for support. Unfortunately, our partner may be downright terrified of these emotions and do anything they can to stop your feelings from coming out.”

In these scenarios, Heck recommends asking yourself: “What does my partner’s reaction to my sadness say about them?”

My partner doesn’t communicate how they’re feeling. 

Women tend to feel more emotionally connected to their partners when they’re able to talk openly about their feelings and know that their partner feels comfortable doing the same, Marsh said. When it’s one-sided — one partner is opening up, while the other is not — it can lead to a disconnect.

“Emotional connection fuels positive perceptions of the self and relationship: I am important to my partner, my partner is there for me and my spouse cares about me,” she said. “The reverse is also true. When women feel emotionally disconnected, they often report a struggle to feel important, loved and close to their partner.”

Marsh said that cultural norms and gender expectations may be responsible for why, particularly in heterosexual relationships, men may have more trouble identifying and discussing their feelings.

“Most men are taught to not wear their emotions on their sleeve,” she said. “In relationships, this often gets misinterpreted as not caring or wanting to connect with their spouse.”

To address the issue, Marsh suggests that the couple regularly sets aside time to connect and communicate.

“In that time, it’s essential to create an environment that feels relaxed and safe,” she said. “The more non-judgmental and accepting the tone of the conversation, the more likely their partner will feel comfortable exploring their emotions with words.”  

I feel sexually invisible to my partner.

During a long-term relationship, it’s not uncommon for periods of sexlessness to arise or for intimacy to decrease over time. It takes work to keep that sexual spark burning bright. Duley’s female clients often share that they no longer feel desired by their partners like they did in the early days of the relationship. 

“They feel the longer they’re together with their person, whether married or living together, the more invisible they feel to their partner,” she said. “When exploring this further, it usually seems that life has gotten in the way and they haven’t taken time to really nurture their relationship on a continuous basis.”

To start getting back in a groove, Duley recommends that the couple revisit some of the dates or other fun activities they once enjoyed together and make a point to do them.

Women can also try doing things that make them feel sexier or more confident (getting in a good workout routine, putting on a favorite outfit or having a solo dance party), while also trying to improve the intimate connection with their partners (through cuddling, sexting or a good ol’ make-out session). Soon, that sexy sparkle should make its way back into the relationship.

I don’t understand why my partner doesn’t care about something that’s important to me.

A number of therapist Susan Pease Gadoua’s female clients have shared that they are upset by or dissatisfied with the way their male partners respond to their emotions. They assume that because their partner doesn’t react the same way to a distressing situation, it must mean they don’t care about it. But most of the time, that’s not the case, Gadoua said. They do care; they just process these emotional situations in a different way — perhaps because they compartmentalize their feelings, perhaps because they’re taught from a young age to conceal their emotions

“In a session I had recently with one couple, the wife told her husband that she was very upset about his reaction to her breaking her leg in a skiing accident,” said Gadoua, co-author of “The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels.” “Rather than being empathetic for her physical pain and lost mobility and time off work, his response to her was to ‘get over it,’ followed by letting her know that he no longer wanted to talk about it. She was devastated by how cold and uncaring he could be. He later realized that he was basically treating her the way he treats himself. Males are socialized to ‘power through’ pain, problems and fears.”

My partner isn’t affectionate with me. 

“I am always at a loss when women come into my office and spend the session criticizing their partner with a variety of insults and attacks and then say, ‘You never show me love and affection,’” Heck said.

In these instances, Heck said, the woman has usually made a number of bids for affection — asking her partner to sit next to her on the couch so they can cuddle or reaching out to hold her S.O.’s hand on a walk — that have gone unnoticed by her partner. Then she gets fed up and lashes out, hoping to get some type of response from her partner, even if it’s not the one she wanted.

“It isn’t until she unleashes the 50-pound cannonball that he finally responds,” Heck said. “The response is never the love and affection she wants but at least it’s something, right? Try finding any small gesture of love, kindness and affection to reward and do it often. Remember, we get more of what we reward.”


Theatre Of The Absurd: A Film Reviewer Attends A Modi Rally

$
0
0

On the way to the Gandhigram grounds in Udaipur, Umesh muttered furiously under his breath. The Uber driver, all of 29 years old, was upset because his driving gig was preventing him from attending Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s rally.

“There’s only one man who’s cleaning this country and that’s why the media is framing him with false charges like Rafale,” he said, catching me by surprise (I hadn’t told him I was a journalist). “And don’t misunderstand me, I’m not a blind BJP supporter. I didn’t like Vasundhara Raje because she didn’t do anything for the state. But Modi, he’s bombing our enemies.”

We may be in 2019 but fans of Gadar: Ek Prem Katha are still aplenty (maybe that’s good news for Sunny Deol?).

Umesh, who said he gets his information from a WhatsApp group that shares “positive videos” about India, set the tone for the rest of the evening, where Modi and other BJP leaders took to the pulpit to deliver chilling messages containing gleeful threats of violence (to Pakistan of course, what did you think?) and twisted references to chest-beating dialogues from jingoistic Bollywood movies.

Udaipur, a city of about half a million people, will vote on April 29. The BJP, which lost the 2018 assembly elections in Rajasthan to the Congress, has been aggressively mobilising support in India’s largest state by area, which sends 25 lawmakers to the Lok Sabha.

For the latest elections news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

At the rally itself—Rajasthan police officials estimated some 50,000 people had turned up—the mood was similarly charged. Hyper-jingoistic rhetoric about nationalism dominated the evening to loud cheers from the audience, mostly elderly people from nearby villages such as Badgaon, Chandwas and Dadiya.

Not all of them had turned up because they were undying Modi supporters though.

An old man who had travelled from a village some distance away said he didn’t care about BJP or Modi but had come because he was asked to by the village sarpanch.

“They sent a jeep and I was told to get into it. Several jeeps left from our village with about 10-12 people in each,” he said.

It was a scene that would have fit right into Peepli Live, the 2010 political satire produced by Aamir Khan.

Several turbaned locals peppered the massive maidan, some as old as 86, braving the sweltering heat. More people told me that they had been brought by their village heads. Skin glistening under the harsh sun, the villagers looked distraught, and sounded disillusioned.

“We are merely a collective of mere vote banks, who’d be forgotten once the circus of election is over,” a young man, Santosh Singh, part of a group of daily wage workers, told me.

If this was a ’70s Prakash Mehra movie, the collective would’ve been led by an angry young man who’d swear to fix the system.

But it’s 2019 and we are angry young people, sure.

But only on Twitter.

The women were in a separate enclosure, mostly wearing ghoongats and colourful saris, making the place look kaleidoscopic.

When I ventured close to ask some questions, a policeman stopped me, asking, “Ladies mein baithega ka?” (“Will you sit among the ladies?”).

Walking around the ground, it was apparent that every enclosure had a gaggle of BJP volunteers, dressed in those familiar bright orange tees with Modi’s photos and the declaration of ‘NaMo Again’. Matching bandanas were wrapped around their heads.

The stage was occupied by various local BJP leaders. Whenever a politician said something on the lines of “Bhajpa Zindabad”, these volunteers screamed the loudest. The locals were too tired to participate in the spectacle, although they’d let out a cheer sporadically.

The run-up to Modi

Modi had been expected by 4.15 pm, but was late. In the meantime, local politicians took turns at the mike, often muttering sheer nonsense, often to hilarious effect. A BJP politician went up and sang in an indecipherable tune: “Mewar kipaanch seat humari jholi mein bhardo, bhardo...

The men, women and children stared back without expression—if you were looking to make a Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro for our times, this would be fertile ground.

Ratan Singh, a 34-year-old who runs a stationary shop in Udaipur, said that, contrary to reports that small businessmen had suffered over the past couple of years, he wanted Modi to win again. “He has bought transparency to the system. As a small-time businessman, GST has made my life easier.”

What about demonetisation and the pain it caused?

Singh cheerfully sacrificed others to the larger good, saying, “Some have to suffer for the well-being of the nation.”

Allegations of corruption, poor governance and caste-based violence were all “media propaganda”.

A BJP politician went up and sang in an indecipherable tune: “Mewar ki paanch seat humari jholi mein bhardo, bhardo...”

Among the attendees who had come of their own will, this was a shared sentiment.

Roshan, a 38-year old laundry worker from the SC community, said that the BJP had given him electricity and internet.

“My village is spread across a hill stretch where it’s very difficult to install electricity poles. But BJP made it possible. I also use online banking thanks to their digital push.”

All this while, politicians kept taking over the stage, drawing cheers whenever they yelled a nationalistic slogan.

Every speech began with “Bharat Mata Ki Jai”, “Vande Mataram” and “Modi Hai To Mumkin Hai.”

After an hour a pattern had emerged, one that was followed by Modi when he finally arrived. The politicians would begin talking about the achievements of BJP at the state level—laying roads, electrification of villages, installing gas connections—but soon enthusiastically expand upon their main point: bombing the enemy.

Arjunlal Meena, the sitting BJP MP from Udaipur, went on stage theatrically and boasted about how there had been “no terrorist attacks” in the past five years (a brazen lie).

“And if at all somebody got training and attacked, Modi made sure he didn’t go back alive.”

Meena reminded me of the sidekick who exists in a commercial potboiler solely to prop up the hero and cover up for his many follies, kind of like Gaggy to the Joker.

“You may have heard that our Army men were attacked. But Modiji wasted no time. Within a month, he took revenge. He went inside Pakistan and took revenge,” he said, an apparent reference to the Balakot air strike.

The cheers, one could tell, mostly came from BJP’s youth volunteers who were strategically spread across the maidan, dropping water packets randomly at the crowd and waving Modi cutouts.

“ARREY dena hai bhai dena hai, Modi kovote dena hai,” Meena chanted.

One thing was clear — whoever took centre-stage, the focus was always on one man, Modi. From old to young, Modi was omnipresent through the many cutouts. In the rally, a young boy stood next to a Modi cut-out with a Modi mask in hand, the imagery eerily reminiscent of Jordan Peele’s Us, where a group of people are haunted by their own doppelgangers.  

Reel-life inspiration

And when he arrived, a little after 5pm, a collective euphoria took over the crowd. Almost everyone stood up in unison to catch a glimpse of him, some jubilantly raising Modi posters where he’s seen rising from a lotus, BJP’s symbol.

After reciting a rehearsed greeting in Marwari, Modi spoke about the significance of first-time voters and about getting back financial fraudsters who had escaped the country. “They won’t be able to sleep comfortably,” he promised.

“The earlier government was lending to their billionaire friends by putting pressure on banks; We are paying the poorest of the poor under Mudra scheme without a guarantee to our tribal brothers and sisters,” Modi said.

Almost half of Udaipur’s population consists of people from scheduled tribes.

And then, following the script, Modi segued into rhetoric about soldiers martyred at the border, strategically juxtaposing it with the bravery of Rajput king Maharana Pratap. Just some casual local context.

And that 2013 EC order asking political parties to “exercise great caution while making any reference to the Armed Forces in their political campaigns”?

When did that ever stopthePM?

Throughout his speech, Modi kept referring to himself in third person.

It was a tired script that rested purely on delivery. But it worked and he knew it worked. Men around me, at the mention of gas connections, electrification and subsidies, would suddenly spring to life at the mere mention of Pakistan. Throw in some references to the opposition demanding “saboot” of “our sapoot” (proof of our martyrs, referring to the purported death toll from the Balakot air strikes), and a veritable jingoistic party began on the ground.

And how can any reference to Pakistan be complete without this season’s flavour, Uri?

“Mewar ka josh kaisa hai? asked the PM.

And if the opposition complains about politicising the Armed Forces? Modi has an answer to that too.

“They say I shouldn’t talk about nationalism and terrorism. They can persuade others, but Modi? Not Modi....” he said, his trademark drawl stretching half a second more than usual.

“Of course national security should be talked about. Why not? These aren’t Udaipur municipality elections, these are national elections. Congress ruled for 60 years and they don’t even know what issues people care about,” he said, taking a dramatic pause.

Modi, it seemed, had saved his best line for the end, another reference to Uri.

“Modi….(dramatic pause) ghar mein ghus ke maarta hai,” he said.

It was an evening of radical right-wing rhetoric but this one sentence drew the loudest cheers.

It was the kind of low-key vitriol you’d imagine Amrish Puri delivering in Nayak, the 2001 Anil Kapoor-Rani Mukerji starrer.

Ironically, Modi’s comment could have embodied many things: every act of violence faced by minorities and Dalits, attacks on intellectuals and journalists, lawyers and activists and subversion of democratic institutions.

And the Prime Minister, who takes pride in never having held a press conference in his tenure, seemed to think that overwhelming ‘ayes’ from a crowd comprised of his supporters was more than enough.

“Modi sahi raastey pe hai? Modi sahi hai na? Aap khush to ho na?”

Thunderous applause.

“Modi hai to…”

“Mumkin hai,” the crowd erupted.

Sri Lanka's Social Media Ban Is Making Facebook Look Like A Victim. It Isn’t

$
0
0

The debate over the Sri Lankan government’s decision to block social media platforms in the light of the tragic Easter Sunday bombings brings into sharp relief what has been evident for some years now — platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter transmit and amplify the currents of discord coursing through our societies.

Over the past 48 hours, social media researchers including those based in Sri Lanka, have made telling and sensible arguments against the ban: In many countries, including Sri Lanka, state media or government-friendly but privately-owned ones are often the biggest sources of misinformation. Also, blocking social media platforms doesn’t work and those determined to spread misinformation can still do so by accessing these platforms using virtual private networks, or VPNs.

Despite its many flaws, social media, these researchers point out, allows private citizens to coordinate with each other, particularly at moments of crisis and calamity when panic-stricken families are desperate to ensure their relatives are safe.

And finally, Sri Lankan society, like most societies, is complex and riots between communities are often a consequence of forces far greater than social media. Shutting down these platforms serves little purpose.

The researchers are right; fencing off parts of the internet is almost never a good answer — no matter the question.

Yet that is only one part of the story.

Examining the Sri Lanka shutdown as an “artefact” — the age of social media’s equivalent of an excavated shard of ancient pottery —  offers a moment to assess just how rapidly the charms of social media have faded since the heady days of the Arab Spring. If internet shutdowns during that time were straightforward cases of oppression, it is not so easy to dismiss the Sri Lanka shutdown.

If social media was once a “weapon of the weak”, to borrow a phrase from anthropologist James Scott’s 1985 book on peasant conflicts in rural Malaysia, it is now a cudgel of the powerful.

Oppressive governments, nation-states, intelligence agencies and well-funded political parties have long since woken up to the unparallelled access that social media offers to the subjects of their control, and the trade-offs between the many ills of social media and the online alliances between social movements no longer appears as good a deal as it once was.

Across the Palk Strait in India, Sri Lanka’s northern neighbour, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) now runs sophisticated, well-financed misinformation campaigns across Twitter, Facebook, and Whatsapp. The BJP, as a recent HuffPost India investigation revealed, employs hundreds of paid consultants to spread blatantly communal and divisive content, and works with private companies to covertly run hundreds of WhatsApp groups — that bear no sign of being funded by the party — to bombard millions of Indians with propaganda.

 

Across the Palk Strait in India, Sri Lanka’s northern neighbour, the ruling BJP now runs sophisticated, well-financed misinformation campaigns across Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp.

Indian political parties take turns to influence Twitter trends by coordinated tweeting across thousands of bots. This practice is so prevalent that the activities of the “IT Cells” of political fronts constitute their own sub-genre of conversations on Twitter.

Indian state police departments use online sentiment-analysis software to analyse what citizens are saying on Twitter and Facebook, and are in the process of building ever-more intrusive tools for social media surveillance and tracking. The Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, one of India’s more tech-savvy politicians, has a wall-sized screen in his office that tracks every time he is mentioned on social media to assess if his government is spoken of in a positive light.

Social media, specifically Facebook and Twitter, are not great levellers as was previously assumed, but powerful amplifiers — the loudest and best-financed voices offline are also the loudest voices online as well.

Power play

In 2017, I reported through an internet shutdown spanning several days in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh. A farmers’ agitation for better prices had turned violent after the police opened fire on protesters, killing five farmers. As the violence spiralled out of control, the government responded by shutting off the internet.

Indian state governments are amongst the most frequent deployers of internet shutdowns in the world, with 134 network shutdowns in 2018, and over a 100 in 2016-17 according to this paper by Jan Rydzak.

The protests that spanned several cities in adjoining states had been coordinated over WhatsApp groups, but these had been set up only  after farmer representatives had held several face-to-face meetings in the months preceding the protests. Shutting off the internet didn’t shut off the protests — farmers reverted to their peer networks, where local leaders in each city coordinated with each other over ordinary telephones.

For the state government and police, shutting down the internet also carried great symbolic heft — it offered them an avenue to telegraph their power to the farmers they were trying to suppress.

The Sri Lanka shutdown is a reminder that all conversations about speech — online or offline — are ultimately conversations about power. And despite appearances to the contrary, social media platforms controlled by giant, unaccountable, American companies like Facebook and Twitter are likely to advance the causes of freedom only by accident and not by design.

'BJP's Dhai Kilo Ka Haath': Sunny Deol's Political Entry Gets The Twitter Treatment

$
0
0

Soon after actor Sunny Deol joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday, speculations were rife that the party is likely to field him from either Gurdaspur or Chandigarh in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections

And needless to say, there were many memes doing the rounds of social media. From taking his famous Bollywood dialogues to making GIFs from his iconic movies, Twitter users lost no time in appropriating Deol’s movie scenes.  

While everyone waits (or, maybe not) for the announcement of Deol’s candidature, here are the tweets you need to see: 

One of the most famous dialogues of Deol is ‘Tareekh Pe Tareekh’ from Damini, and ′Yeh dhai kilo ka haath jab kisipe padtha hai na, toh aadmin ut-tha nahi uthh jaata hai’.

Now that Urmila Matondkar is also contesting the Lok Sabha polls on a Congress ticket, this Twitter user is only “expecting Bobby Deol to join AAP any moment now”.

Avengers: Endgame Early Reviews Suggest Marvel Fans Are In For Another Treat

$
0
0

Marvel fans have reason to get excited, as the early reviews for Avengers: Endgame are here, and they’re positively glowing.

On Monday night, the film had its first ever showing in Los Angeles, attended by a number of its key players, including Brie Larson, Chris Evans (the American one, that is), Scarlett Johansson and Chris Hemsworth.

Also at the event were a number of journalists, and while their reviews are still under embargo at the time of writing, they have shared some of their thoughts about the film on Twitter, with words like “mind-blowing”, “extraordinary” and “epic” all being thrown around.

Here’s a sample of what the critics are saying about Avengers: Endgame so far...

Avengers: Endgame is the 22nd film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and features stars from across the franchise’s past instalments.

This includes actors from the show’s earlier films like Robert Downey Jr as Iron Man, Chris Hemsworth as Thor and Chris Evans as Captain America, as well as newer additions like Chadwick Boseman as Black Panther, Brie Larson as Captain Marvel and Tom Holland as Spider-Man.

Also among the cast are Benedict Cumberbatch as Doctor Strange, Guardians Of The Galaxy’s Chris Pratt and an array of other MCU stars, including Gwyneth Paltrow, Bradley Cooper and Don Cheadle.

The stars of Avengers: Endgame at the film's LA premiere

Endgame serves as a sequel to 2018’s Avengers: Infinity War, which won similar praise from critics, particularly thanks to its impressive large-scale cross-over.

In The Future, Will Your Kids Be Able To Sue You For Oversharing Online?

$
0
0

Last month, Gwyneth Paltrow got herself into a bit of parenting pickle with her daughter Apple on Instagram when she shared a ski selfie of her and the teen with her 5.4 million followers. Apparently, she did not receive permission to post the photo, which irked the 14-year-old. 

“Mom we have discussed this,” Apple, whose own profile is private, shared in the comments section of Paltrow’s post. “You may not post anything without my consent.” 

The media jumped on the story of the “nonconsensual selfie” ― a tale that dovetailed nicely with another news story centered on a celeb oversharer that developed a few days later, when the singer Pink drew the ire of some on the internet after sharing an image of her 2-year-old son, sans diaper. In a second revised post, a strategic black scribble covered the toddler’s private parts. 

“There’s something seriously wrong with a lot of you out there,” Pink wrote in the caption of the edited photo. “Going off about my baby’s penis? About circumcision??? Are you for real? As any normal mother at the beach, I didn’t even notice he took off his swim diaper.”

On Monday, the pop star told Ellen DeGeneres she was going to stop sharing photos of her kids on social media altogether because of the backlash.

Whether you believe the pics should have been posted or not, the Paltrow and Pink examples highlight a parenting divide that’s as modern as it gets. On one side, there’s the sharenters ― parents who spare no detail when posting about their kids, usually starting with that first grainy sonogram. On the other, you’ve got the privacy-minded parents who prefer to keep personal pics on the camera roll of their iPhone. 

Even parents who opt not to post understand the urge. When her son was born a few years back, Abbey Sharp, a Toronto-based dietitian, and mom blogger and YouTuber at “Abbey’s Kitchen,” decided with her husband to only post about their newborn on a private Facebook group with friends and family who truly care about the baby. 

“That was my choice, but I get wanting to post,” she said. “Being a social media ‘influencer,’ my entire life is documented and shared online, so it was heartbreaking to imagine not being able to share that very important major part of my life.” 

Jenny Jutt, a radio personality and mom of two teens, took the opposite approach with sharing. She frequently posts about her kids, now 19 and 20, and even discusses them on her “Just Jenny” radio show on SiriusXM. For what it’s worth, she doesn’t understand all the fuss over Paltrow or Pink’s posts.

“I’m certain Apple Martin was being tongue in cheek with her mom as my daughter would be with me, and Pink is just way cool and I don’t think she was intending to post a ‘dick pic,’” Jutt said. 

But even as a proud oversharer, Jutt recognizes the need for kid-approved boundaries.

“My kids are 20 and 19 and I still ask permission before posting about them on social media and before talking about them on my SiriusXM show,” she said. “I’m all for truth and vulnerability on social media but I’m also mindful of overexposure.”

Sharing on social media ― and risking overexposure ― is a slippery slope. At its best, Facebook and Instagram give your far-off grandma a peek at cute milestone moments in your kiddo’s life. At its worst, you get scary invasions of privacy and kids with a massive database of intel compiled about them before they’re enrolled in pre-K. (And then there’s something else entirely, like the mommy blogger who went viral last year for lamenting how few “likes” her 6-year-old brings in, compared with siblings.)

Critics of oversharing parents say it's not fair that kids are having their digital footprint created before they have a say in the matter.

It all makes you wonder: Should we just let kids live without every moment being documented online? How much of a say should kids have in creating their own digital footprint?

And even if they are old enough to give you permission to post, does a 5- or 6-year-old really understand the complexities of how things get shared, commented on and go viral online? 

“It’s certainly an issue which I have seen increasingly in my practice over recent years and it is a cause of concern and anxiety for teens,” said Genevieve von Lob, a psychologist and author of “Happy Parent, Happy Child: 10 Steps to Stress-free Family Life.”

“It’s understandable that as parents we adore our kids and love to share as much about them as possible,” von Lob said. “But by sharing endless pictures, you are creating a ‘digital tattoo’ that could stay with them for the rest of their lives.”

A digital tattoo, that, depending on the privacy settings of your account, will be visible to college and job recruiters, potential girlfriends or boyfriends, and everyone else for the rest of their lives. Do job scouts at Aiden’s dream employer really need to see a photo of baby Aiden learning to go potty like a big boy? 

Suing a parent for sharing: Could it happen?

Some have suggested a lingering digital tattoo could have legal implications for parents once their child grows up. In 2016 in France, a viral online campaign urged parents to cut back on posting for their child’s privacy.

French police suggested that the images could attract sexual predators, and one legal expert cautioned that parents may face future lawsuits from their children for violating their privacy. Under French privacy law, anyone convicted of publishing and distributing images of another person without their consent can face up to one year in prison and a fine that’s equivalent to more than $50,000. That would apply to parents posting images of their kids as well.

Could a successful “sharenting” lawsuit ever happen in the U.S.? Probably not, said Mark Bartholomew, a University at Buffalo expert on cyberlaw.

For starters, there’s the parent-child immunity doctrine — the legal notion that a child cannot bring legal action against his or her parents for torts, or civil wrongs, parents inflict while the child is a minor.

Plus, as Bartholomew told HuffPost, there’s really no precedent or laws directed specifically at parent oversharing online. (A parent could claim a request to remove a pic violates their First Amendment right to free speech.)

It's very unlikely we'll see a successful sharenting lawsuit anytime soon, one legal expert said

Bartholomew said an aggrieved child would need to find a legal hook for their complaint.

“Claims of emotional distress and defamation or other privacy violations come to mind, but there would be a very high bar for success,” he said. “A child claiming that a parent’s posting of photos caused her emotional distress would have to prove that the parent’s behavior was ‘extreme’ and ‘outrageous,’” he explained.

Given how commonplace it is for parents to post every waking moment of their childrens’ lives on Instagram or Facebook these days, Bartholomew said it’s unlikely such a legal claim would succeed. 

Should mommy bloggers be judged differently?

So, what does Bartholomew think of mommy bloggers and “influencers” who make their living doing a sort of mom-meets-“The Truman Show” act online, where everything is content, no matter how personal or potentially awkward it might be for their kids? 

“Parents like that definitely need to consider using pseudonyms for their kids,” Bartholomew said. “The problem is, readers are attracted to what they see as genuine revelations, and using real names may help the blogging parent seem more authentic. There’s a tension between winning over audiences and preserving a private space for children to grow up.”

A perfect example of that tension is seen in Christie Tate, a mommy blogger who made headlines last year when she wrote a Washington Post piece explaining why she still blogs about her kids, even though her fourth-grade daughter hates it. 

The daughter apparently asked her mom if all the essays and photographs she had found by Googling could be taken down. “I told her that was not possible,” wrote Tate. “And furthermore, ‘I’m not done exploring my motherhood in my writing.’”

Would a kid who has pages and pages of embarrassing online anecdotes have a better chance of winning legal action?

“Yes, the more information that’s posted out there about a child, the more potential there is for some sort of legal violation,” Bartholomew said. “As influencers and lifestyle bloggers try to seem provocative and authentic to their audiences, they might eventually cross a line into posting something that the law considers too extreme.”

That said, in court, an image ― an embarrassing full-frontal of your kid, for instance ― has more power to shock than writing from a mommy blog.

“One can imagine a parent posting a photograph of their child on their parenting blog that is so intrusive or disturbing that a judge would consider this to be outrageous behavior by the parent,” Bartholomew said. “To my knowledge, there hasn’t yet been a lawsuit like this in the United States, but it could definitely happen.” 

Some parents are getting more sensible about what they post. 

The more we talk about the culture of online sharing, the more refined our boundaries around it become. Parent bloggers are as vocal as ever, even the ones who stay mum about their kids’ lives. For every parent who posts a selfie featuring their baby’s bare bottom or a barf-y onesie, there’s another mom or dad eager to explain why they post in moderation, or not at all. 

Ray FitzGerald ― a parenting coach who runs the site “Raise a Legend” and doesn’t post his daughter’s name or age online ― often tells his readers to follow the “three P rules of posting.”

There’s privacy (“Make sure your privacy settings aren’t public. Treat your child’s private images like your Social Security number and don’t hand it out like digital candy”); perception (“If you wouldn’t want a similar picture of yourself shared, then you likely shouldn’t share one of your child”); and permission (a rule he admits mostly applies to older kids). 

FitzGerald’s daughter will turn 20 in a few weeks. Her digital footprint is entirely hers. Though he acknowledged the no-posting policy he and his wife came up with isn’t for everyone, he wishes parents would be a little more thoughtful in what they share.

“The best thing a parent can do is pause before posting a picture of their child online,” FitzGerald said. “If it’s still something you think is important to post after a few hours, then go for it. Far too often, we throw things on social media on a whim and don’t think about the long-term ramifications.”

Recognize that you’re the sole guardian of your child’s public image for now, not just a proud parent who feels compelled to share. 

“Don’t create a situation where he or she may have to explain a past post from a parent,” FitzGerald said. “It’s just not worth it.”

Saudi Arabia Executes 37 Citizens For Terrorism-Related Crimes

$
0
0
A file image of Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

DUBAI — Saudi Arabia executed 37 Saudis for terrorism-related crimes including attacks on security installations, the Interior Ministry said Tuesday.

The report said the executions were carried out by beheading and that two of the executed men’s bodies were publicly pinned to a poll for several hours in a process that is not frequently used by the kingdom and has sparked controversy for its grisly display. The government defends such executions as a powerful tool for deterrence.

The Interior Ministry statement said those executed had adopted extremist ideologies and formed terrorist cells with the aim of spreading chaos and provoking sectarian strife. It said the individuals had been found guilty according to the law and ordered executed by the Specialized Criminal Court in Riyadh, which specializes in terrorism trials, and the country’s high court.

The individuals were found guilty of attacking security installations with explosives, killing a number of security officers and cooperating with enemy organizations against the interests of the country, the Interior Ministry said.

The statement was carried across state-run media, including the Saudi news channel al-Ekhbariya. The statement read on the state-run news channel opened with a verse from the Quran that condemns attacks that aim to create strife and disharmony and warns of great punishment for those who carry out such attacks.

Those executed hailed from Riyadh, Mecca, Medina and Asir, as well as Shiite Muslim populated areas of the Eastern Province and Qassim. The executions also took place in those various regions.

The statement named all those executed, which included several from large families and tribes in Saudi Arabia.

The mass execution that took place Tuesday was ratified by a royal decree. It comes a day after the Islamic State group said it was behind an attack on Sunday on a Saudi security building in the town of Zulfi in which all four gunmen were killed and three security officers were wounded.

Game Of Thrones' Emilia Clarke Defends Daenerys' Low-Key Reaction To Jon Snow Revelation

$
0
0

Warning: This article contains spoilers for the eighth series of Game Of Thrones.

Game Of Thrones star Emilia Clarke has defended her character’s rather nonplussed reaction to the news that Jon Snow was actually her nephew in the show’s most recent episode.

As Game Of Thrones fans will hopefully have seen by now, the end of this week’s episode saw Daenerys confronted with the news that she was actually related to Kit Harington’s character, a bit of a blow, given that they’ve been sleeping together for some time now.

However, as viewers saw, Daenerys was actually more bothered about the fact this meant Jon Snow had a claim to the Iron Throne, rather than y’know, the fact they’d had sex even though they were full-on blood relatives.

Emilia Clarke in character with co-star Jon Snow

Speaking to Entertainment Weekly, Emilia pointed out that, in her words, “the related thing” is “so normal” to her, explaining: “She could have easily married her brother. It’s not a thing.

“It’s a thing for Jon, but let’s just forget about that. The main thing is we’re up for the same promotion and I’ve been working for it for my entire existence.”

She added: “There’s so much she’s taken on in her duty in life to rectify. There’s so much she’s seen and witnessed and been through and lost and suffered and hurt to get here… and Jon doesn’t even want it!” 

Emilia Clarke at the New York premiere of Game Of Thrones

The most recent episode also saw a divisive sex scene involving Arya Stark and Gendry, which actress Maisie Williams recently admitted she thought was a hoax when she first read it in the script.

Game Of Thrones returns in the early hours of Monday morning for die-hard fans who want to stay up and avoid spoilers, as well as airing later that night at the more work-friendly time of 9pm.


BJP Fields Sunny Deol From Punjab's Gurdaspur

$
0
0

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday released another list of candidates for the 2019 Lok Sabha polls and fielded actor Sunny Deol from Gurdaspur in Punjab. The party has renominated Kirron Kher from Chandigarh as its candidate.

Deol will take on Punjab Congress chief Sunil Jakhar from Gurdaspur, which was in the past represented by the late actor Vinod Khanna from the BJP.

Soon after Deol joined BJP, there were speculations that he may be fielded from either Gurdaspur or Chandigarh.

He joined the party in presence of Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Railway Minister Piyush Goyal, days after he met BJP president Amit Shah at Pune airport.

For the latest elections news and more, follow HuffPost India on TwitterFacebook, and subscribe to our newsletter.

“The way my father (film star Dharmendra) was attached with Atalji, today I have come to join Modiji. Whatever I can do for this family (BJP), I will do it... I won’t talk, I will show you through my work,” Deol said.

(With PTI inputs)

Justice Bobde-Led Panel To Inquire Into Sexual Harassment Allegation Against CJI Gogoi

$
0
0

NEW DELHI — Justice S A Bobde, the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court, was Tuesday appointed to conduct an in-house inquiry into the allegations of sexual harassment levelled against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.


When contacted, Justice Bobde, who is next to the CJI in seniority, confirmed the development.

He said being the number two judge, the Chief Justice of India has appointed him to look into the allegations of sexual harassment charges levelled by a former woman staff.

Justice Bobde told PTI that he has decided to form a panel by inducting two apex court judges ― N V Ramana and Indira Banerjee.

“I decided to have Justice Ramana in the panel as he is next to me in the seniority and Justice Banerjee as she is a woman judge,” Justice Bobde said. 

He said he has already issued notice to the woman who had written letters to the judges and sworn on affidavit about the alleged sexual harassment.

The first hearing will be conducted on Friday and the apex court secretary general has also been asked to be ready with all documents and materials.

“This is going to be an in-house procedure which does not contemplate representation of advocate on behalf of parties. It is not a formal judicial proceeding,” Justice Bobde said.

He clarified that there is no time frame to to complete the inquiry and future course of action will depend on “what comes out of the inquiry” which will be “confidential”.

A three-judge bench headed by CJI on Saturday had held an unprecedented hearing in the wake of allegations made against Justice Gogoi.

Describing the allegations of sexual harassment against him as “unbelievable”, the CJI had convened the extraordinary hearing at the Supreme Court during which he said a larger conspiracy was behind it and he would not stoop so low even to deny these allegations. 

Justice Gogoi had said some “bigger force” wanted to “deactivate” the office of the CJI.

After the Saturday’s hearing, some lawyers body and jurists had criticised the CJI for constituting the bench comprising him, though he had recused himself in the middle of the hearing leaving it for justices Arun Mishra and Sanjiv Khanna to pass the order.

On Tuesday, the CJI set up a fresh bench comprising justices Mishra, R F Nariman and Deepak Gupta to adjudicate the matter relating to sexual harassment levelled against him. 

The former woman apex court staffer had levelled the allegations against the CJI which was brought into public domain by some news web portals on April 20.

The woman had worked at Justice Gogoi’s home office in Delhi and the allegations were carried by these news portals based on the affidavit by the woman.

On Saturday, the apex court had said it is leaving it to the “wisdom of media” to show restraint and act responsibly so that independence of judiciary is not affected. The court, however, decided not to issue any gag order.

In her affidavit, the woman described two incidents of alleged molestation, days after Justice Gogoi was appointed CJI last October and her subsequent persecution.

The woman alleged that she was removed from service after she rebuffed his “sexual advances”. She claimed that her husband and brother-in-law, both of whom were head constables, were suspended for a 2012 criminal case that had been mutually resolved.

Scarlett Johansson And Brie Larson Wore All The Infinity Stones To ‘Endgame’ Premiere

$
0
0

Black Widow and Captain Marvel represented at the “Avengers: Endgame” premiere Monday night.

Actresses Scarlett Johansson (Black Widow) and Brie Larson (Captain Marvel) both stunned on the red carpet.

Larson looked lovely in lilac.

Brie Larson wears lilac to the world premiere of Marvel Studios'

Johansson sparkled in silver.

Scarlett Johansson arrives in sparkles at the premiere of

But what made their outfits super was that both donned all six of the infinity stones, which are pretty significant to the film.

Larson sported five rings and a bracelet that boasted a stone.

Larson’s jewelry.

Meanwhile, Johansson rocked a similar look.

Johansson’s jewelry.

Larson even suggested her accessories were a nod to the film on Instagram by posting a photo of her showing off the gems with the caption “Snapped” — likely a reference to the disastrous events of “Avengers: Infinity War,” caused by one snap of the villain Thanos’ fingers when he wore the Infinity Gauntlet.

Although both actresses donned the six stones, neither of them rocked them in the same order as Thanos in the film.

Yet, fans on Twitter didn’t seem to mind and were excited that both women wore bejeweled references to the movie. 

We’re just hoping that both women — with their badass accessories in tow — strutted onto the red carpet a bit like this:

Mark Ruffalo Had The Cutest Reaction To Learning Brie Larson Was In '13 Going On 30'

$
0
0

Mark Ruffalo had no idea his “Avengers: Endgame” co-star Brie Larson also appeared with him in the 2004 film “13 Going on 30.”

Ruffalo apparently learned about Larson’s role as one of the “Six Chicks” in the 15-year-old movie on Monday, when an “Entertainment Tonight” interviewer showed him an old photograph.

“She was a mean girl! Oh my god. That’s amazing. Wow, I didn’t know that,” exclaimed Ruffalo with a laugh at the Los Angeles premiere of “Avengers: Endgame.” “How come I didn’t know that?”

Ruffalo’s Matt Flamhaff and Larson’s Six Chick never appeared on screen together in “13 Going on 30,” which is likely why Ruffalo was unaware of the connection. The movie, about a girl who makes a wish on her 13th birthday and wakes up 30, co-starred Jennifer Garner as big-time magazine editor Jenna Rink.

Larson told “Entertainment Tonight” she remembered being captivated by the way the cameras moved during filming, and how the finished movie was so different than what she imagined. It was “the moment I realized that I really wanted to direct,” she said.

Many people on social media confessed that they, too, had been unaware that Larson was a Six Chick.

Jaime And Brienne's Swords May Hold An Icy Secret On 'Game Of Thrones'

$
0
0

The most recent episode of “Game of Thrones” Season 8 was a celebration of characters ― characters we’ve come to know and love over the course of nearly eight seasons.

But perhaps no one person is as universally beloved as Brienne of Tarth (Gwendoline Christie), the loyal warrior who has fearlessly defended Stark women since Season 2. In a standout moment from “A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms,” the season’s second installment, she finally got her due ― being knighted by her friend (and would-be boyfriend) Jaime Lannister (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) in an intimate ceremony before a group of men that included her dedicated squire, Podrick (Daniel Portman).

“Is this the first time we see Brienne smile and be happy? It was beautiful,” Coster-Waldau told HuffPost during a phone call on Monday evening. “There’s something about that atmosphere: You have the lightness of Tormund Giantsbane (Kristofer Hivju‎) telling his insane story and then you have the beauty of his honesty. There’s no bullshit, if you will. When he asks Brienne why she isn’t a knight and she says women can’t be because of tradition, he says, ‘Fuck tradition.’ And that rings a bell with Jaime because it’s the truth. She is clearly the most honorable, the most worthy of the title of knight of anyone in the Seven Kingdoms.”

Clearly there is a strong connection between Jaime and Brienne, who went through a transformative journey together in Seasons 2 and 3 as Brienne escorted Jaime, then Catelyn Stark’s (Michelle Fairley) prisoner, back to King’s Landing in exchange for the safety of Sansa (Sophie Turner) and Arya (Maisie Williams). During their ordeal, Jaime loses a hand protecting Brienne against assaulters and even saves her from being dramatically mauled by a bear. Of course, once they’re back in the capital, his power-hungry sister and lover Cersei (Lena Headey) throws cold water on their growing friendship. But before Brienne leaves in pursuit of the missing Sansa and Arya ― who went missing from King’s Landing ― Jaime arms her with a Valyrian steel sword she dubs Oathkeeper.

Coster-Waldau says that moment as well as the knighting scene in the latest episode, is a “weird love letter” Jaime leaves for Brienne.

“When he gave her Oathkeeper, she comes to give it back and he says, ‘No, it’s yours. It’s always been yours.’ It’s easy to read into it that he’s talking about more than just the sword,” the actor said. 

Oathkeeper, however, is very important. Not only is it a powerful weapon against the wights, it is also one of two swords reforged from House Stark’s greatsword, Ice, which landed in Lannister possession after Joffrey (Jack Gleeson) orders it to be used to behead its owner Ned (Sean Bean) in Season 1. Then, Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) gives one of the reforged weapons to Jaime and the other to Joffrey in Season 4.

But Jaime, being the honorable man he has become, gives his to Brienne as a sign of respect for her quest to protect the Stark girls. He then inherits Joffrey’s weapon, named Widow’s Wail, after the king’s death.

This is all to say that Brienne and Jaime have sister swords, and they’re going to use them in the battle against the Night King and his army. 

When asked about the significance of their swords, Coster-Waldau paused a bit, thinking over his response before admitting, “I’m starting to get into deep water here.”

“Hopefully, the horrors that were done to the Starks will come to good,” he added. “But I don’t want to talk about deeper meanings when we still have a few episodes to go. Things will be revealed and certain things won’t, but obviously, there’s meaning. Will it have special meaning in the future? Who knows. But it has meaning in the fact that the Stark children, the girls, were given this sword that was made from Ned Stark’s sword to protect them.” 

It also wasn’t lost on Coster-Waldau that many of the Valyrian steel swords have been passed to different Houses ― Brienne and Jaime now have House Stark’s Ice, Jon Snow (Kit Harington) has House Mormont’s Longclaw, Jorah (Iain Glen) has House Tarly’s Heartsbane, and Arya has an unnamed dagger (sometimes referred to as the Catspaw Dagger) that once belonged to the late Petyr Baelish (Aidan Gillen). While he wouldn’t admit to any potential spoilers, but Coster-Waldau did tell us, “The whole point is that we have to do this together if we want to survive, and I think that’s one way of reading it, for sure. It is ‘The Song of Ice and Fire,’ it’s the way it should be.” 

Speaking of that icy, fiery song, could it be that ― considering everything we now know about Jon Snow, aka Aegon Targaryen ― Brienne and Jaime are the ice to Jon and Daenerys’ (Emilia Clarke) fire? (Forget about the White Walkers!)

“Yeah,” Coster-Waldau told HuffPost, laughing and adding, “Dany didn’t seem too happy about finding out she was related to her lover.”

He continued, “I love how it’s not at all about them being related and having sex ― clearly that’s not a big deal. But she’s like, ‘What? Are you going to fucking claim my throne?! Is that it?’” 

No matter who ends up on the Iron Throne, death is coming, that much is for sure. And Jaime wants to be standing next to Brienne when it does. 

“She likes Jaime Lannister, and she believes in him and the goodness in him, and he absolutely admires and believes in Brienne of Tarth,” Coster-Waldau explained. “I love that he goes to her and says, ‘Listen, I would be honored to serve under your command.’ He’s letting down all his guards and [saying] this is the truth. The truth is I want to be close to you for many reasons but first and foremost, you’re the best. Jaime says himself he’s not the knight he used to be. That golden hand is not efficient when it comes to fighting these undead creatures, and he wants to be close to her when they face death.” 

Viewing all 37777 articles
Browse latest View live